Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7282 14
Original file (NR7282 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
roe eae :
r STAT Oe THE NAVY

re
ad

e
t

—_
sot &. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Sure TN
ARLINGTON. VA 22204-2430

 

AD
pocket Wu. NRVDE2-24
a5 Jamaary 2925

Lu Utada ys

* . a “A
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Ta: secretary of the Navy

LT

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 449 dtd 22 May 14 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 18 Dec 14

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa}, Subject,

reé to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
ct, that the applicable naval record be
rvice record page 11 (Administrative
‘copy at Tae Bh).

Board requesting, in effe
corrected by removing the se
(2070)" entry dated 2 June 2011

Pemarhs
a mhe Board nonsisting oF Messrs. Hicks, Spooner ane Swarens,
reviewed Fe eiieGations Of ==TOr and jnjustics oF

*~

regulations, getexmines Thar

ad below should be taken on the

nee of record. Documentary macerial considered by
and applicable

da of the enclosures, naval records,

che corrective action indicate
available evide

the Board consiste
statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

this Board, petitioner exhausted all

a, Before applying to
regulations

administrative remedies available under existing law and
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence at enclosure (2). the Headquarters Marine

corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's

case has commented to the effect that the reques
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated
3 June 2011. This is to be accomplished by physically removing the
page 11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating the
entry so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through it.

b, That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

Porn ave. Lo ime

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.

=

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13

    Original file (NR3743-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13

    Original file (NR4525 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01991-11

    Original file (01991-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11A (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 8 June and 11 July 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Neuschafer and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2011, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5316 14

    Original file (NR5316 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llic) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) °} entry dated 21 March 2011 {copy at Tab A). a reviewed be onér's Bilegations of error and injustice on 25 January 202 a pursuant to its regulations, devermined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05747-11

    Original file (05747-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 13 June 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Storz and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14

    Original file (NR8961 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10575-10

    Original file (10575-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entries dated 14 and 15 February 2008 with Petitioner’s rebuttal dated 19 February 2008 (copies at Tab B). Aldrich and Trucco and Mr. Boyd, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4610 14

    Original file (NR4610 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 29 June and 19 July 2011, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8328 14

    Original file (NR8328 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NUP of 21 November 2011. b. That Petitioner's record be further corrected by “-. e. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.